Incentives for carbon sequestration may not protect species
Paying rural landowners in Oregon’s Willamette Basin to protect at-risk animals won’t necessarily mean that their newly conserved trees and plants will absorb more carbon from the atmosphere and vice versa, a new study has found.
The rest of the article can be read here.
Related Posts:- Ancient oak trees help reduce global warming
- Carbon caveat
- Turning CO2 into chalk and sand
- CO2 increase in the atmosphere augments tolerance of barley to salinity
- Extinction most likely for rare trees in the Amazon rainforest
- New clues to air circulation in the atmosphere
- Cluster watches Earth’s leaky atmosphere
- True properties of carbon nanotubes measured
- Thawing permafrost likely to boost global warming
- Species extinction threat underestimated due to math glitch, says CU-Boulder study
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
Leave a Reply